The Unsinkable brian cork™

Brian Patrick Cork is living the Authentic Life
Browsing Stuff

its not about me, its about what we do

August5

three brands

 

 

 

 

 

 

Three iconic American brands. An unbeatable (Unsinkable) combination.

Its less about what we do, and so much more about the manner in which we accomplish it.

corks rig 2

 

 

 

 

 

 

peace be to my Brothers and Sisters.

brian patrick cork

Share

Is Android good or merely available? Kind of like a cheap Hooker

August3

to be fair, the title for this post could be deceiving. thusly, you are encouraged to read-on. do it!

Nicholas and I continue our discourse over the dominance of Android (or, not). Airdroid is (or, is becoming[?]) very cool.

As posted in Linkedin…

Brian Patrick Cork – I’m using an #Android handset for testing purposes. Evidently #Apple punishes people for such indiscretions by holding text messages hostage. It has something to do with prior usage of #iMessage. Stand by for updates. But, in a-typical fashion, I am very unhappy with Apple right now. #badideas”

lg g3I recently took notice of the LG G3: http://www.lg.com/us/mobile-phones/g3,and thusly picked one up for vital utilization. It’s brilliant. For the moment I’m not missing my trusted iPhone, in the least.

Nicholas recently reminded me of our lengthy and animated debates over this topic only a few years back. He remains very passionate and quite the champion for Android. I believe his opinions are well-founded.

“Do you remember the conversations from the old days about whether or not Android could ever overtake iOS in popularity? http://thenextweb.com/google/2014/07/31/android-reached-record-85-smartphone-market-share-q2-2014-report/ - NJ”

Below is a recent dissertation I offered-up:

Going back I have always believed that Android was inevitable (goodness… I blogged about it enough).

That said, I’m firm in my convictions that we should swap the word, “popular” for “affordable” and/ or “available”. Thats been part of the epic Google strategy for Android – make sure a version was available for everyone. That makes sense to me. You can get a Metro PCS Android handset, for example. There are many points of distribution, just like whores. The devices may not be state-of-the-art, and the version of Android may be limited, but its a terrific way to ensure your Operating System proliferates and dominates.

Meanwhile, the article does have some inaccuracies. For example, Apple is not “losing” market-share, in this case. Its simply not getting market share in some regions (or, choosing to ignore it). Apple is selling more iPhones than ever, with record profits. BUT (big but), that’s not the point of the article. The author would actually do Android more justice by not offering such misleading and contrasting information about other companies. The best point of the article (although not elegantly described) is that Android is dominate (by users not necessarily quality) through a saturation distribution model.

NOTE: I need to investigate why LINUX did not benefit from this same thinking. It would be interesting to see what the numbers looked like if Apple had an entry-level iPhone (even the 4S is expensive compared to most Android devices). But, the stigma amongst Apple users for the older devices or perceived lower-end (i.e. 5C) indicates its a simple matter of status. Some high-end Android devices like the Galaxy S5 and LG G3 are more expensive than an iPhone today. So, I am also curious about what the acquisition numbers for those compared directly to the iPhone are. If you ask most teenagers (in the US and Great Britain, for example), they want an iPhone. For further example, at Cambridge and Milton High Schools in Alpharetta, 96% of the kids have smartphones, and 94% of those are iPhones (this is based on an actual poll through Instagram, Twitter and parking lot). On the other hand, about 60% of the engineers at DSI (Bob Twitchell) use Android Devices (I THINK they prefer the Nexus line).

Here is a poll question I’d like to see: If you have an Android device but could have an late model iPhone with the same data plan, would you switch?

Random thought: I need to investigate what is happening with used handsets and the residual value comparisons between the high-end Android devices and iPhones.

I’m not challenging. I am genuinely keen for the facts. I don’t have a bias or preference any longer. I do have a healthy fascination with it all.

A few days later…

…Also…

I share your position that Android now possesses an overwhelming share of the mobile market – this includes smartphones and tablets (tablets often being overlooked).

However, what many people don’t understand when touting these numbers is that Android devices are not used that much for internet web browsing and related activity. This is meaningful, and critical to understanding how the trend will shift and evolve. I’m confident more mobile Web users ran iOS (45.6%) than Android (43.7%). The actual margin appears small, but its significant considering the number of Android devices. This probably means many low-end Android phones are used more like traditional feature phones – for simple phone calls.

So, the majority of Android users today are fairly unsophisticated. This tracks to the belief that Android appeals to the masses, mostly because of cost and the availability of cheap starter handsets. But, I believe this will change as the software continues to improve, and the cost of the handsets increases. Ironically, snob appeal will kick-in (that is part of the iPhones appeal, along with ease-of-use). More decision-makers and corporate-users will adopt the Android platform.

For me an interesting question is who is going to ultimately dominate the tablet market in terms of both numbers and productivity. That has me looking at Microsoft, again.

NOTE: I’ve been working with a group of super-wealthy and influential Spanish businessmen. Today, they swear by Blackberry. Go figure. It only bares observing for now.

peace be to my Brothers and Sisters.

brian patrick cork

Share

touching base with Apple and Google and why they may think different but are the same

July29
Apple and Google may appear to think different. however, soon enough, they will be the same.

Colossians 4:6 says, “Let your conversation be always full of grace, seasoned with salt …”

lets have you privy to a recent exchange with the unrepentant Nicholas…

Going back to 1998 Apple retooled its core operating system and adopted UNIX. https://www.apple.com/opensource/ That is what made OS X so profoundly exciting at the time. What most will never know is that OS X was almost a flavor of Ubuntu. Steve Job’s NeXT (Jobs was fired by Apple. He created NeXT. He was rehired by Apple. They used the Next OS as the foundation for what is now OS X), had several versions under test that were LINUX.

I don’t know anything about the back door issue and the NSA. That would be so contrary to Apple’s overriding philosophy I suspect they would realize a mass exodus from every aspect of leadership. Standing against that sort of thing is part of their collective DNA. Back when Apple and Google were aligned, part of the pact was to create solutions for people, not against them (I understand Apple is sort of viewed as, “the man”, now). That was the underlying effort to, “do no evil” on Google’s part. Jobs helped them form that philosophy. In fact, I asked ______ ______ [Apple executive] about a pact with NSA directly, and his simple response was, “seriously, Cork?”. So, be at ease over that misinformation.

The LG G3 does have Google Now. And, in-line with your insight around Sergey Brin, the only thing I can’t find is Assist (that might be a Motorola thing). However, some of those features are found buried in Settings, anyway. By the way… You say that, “Brin wants Google to give users the information they need before they realize they need it…”. That vision is what many say Steve Jobs offered us all when he gave us products we did not know we could not live without until we had them in our hands.

I’m not biased towards Apple any longer. Your point: “For everyone who isn’t an Apple investor (read: almost everyone), revenue is pointless”, is a good one. I am a shareholder to be sure. But, the big play there (by my terms) is long over. I’m quite pleased with the dividends. If I have a bias today, it leans towards the latest champion. I’m not sure who that is. But, I am having more fun with Google-centric products, partners, and related services. My daughters and all of their friends only want Apple products. For me that makes them boring (kind of ironic, huh?). So, I guess today I am mostly infatuated with LG. The LG Ultra-wide monitor screen made me investigate larger versions for my homes and offices. I also like Samsung products and appreciate how they are helping Google with its own form of eco-system. That said, I am very suspicious of any Korean company. In any event… Something to ponder is that I’m reasonably certain Apple could have put much of the technology many take for granted with Samsung devices, and those developed by LG (Nexus, right?) into the iPhone 4, 4S, 5 and 5S. They tend to be a bit stubborn and wait until those technologies “fit” best. Their vision is to (mostly) offer a very finished feel to their products and services The screens are perhaps the best example). And, that is why I loved Apple; the finished eco-stem that worked easily for me. Meanwhile, start looking for some pretty interesting things to pop up from them based on fairly long-standing patents. Apple genuinely is an innovation company. But, they know when and how to acquire companionable technology. They play the press like a cheap accordion. And, they have a clock in their collective heads that frustrates people outside of the inner circles. But, I do agree that most people around the world need (even more so than want) cutting-edge technology at a certain price-point. Android will probably be the most used operating system for a broad range of technology for quite some time. That said, there is a company in China that might open some eyes with their own Operating System. And, I don’t really care about perception of market share. Despite that Apple keeps making more money every quarter despite packing their products with better technology and still incrementally reducing the price (iMacs, MacBooks, etc). Also… Today devices like the Lg G3, Galaxy S5, and Nexus 5 are more expensive than an iPhone. There is a Chromebook on the market for over $1600 (its all about the screen [I can relate because I found the LG ultra-wide just so I could make the images pushed by my ASUS Chromebox better]). Some how that tid-bit has managed to stay out of the press, and our reporting consciousness. What I think will be interesting is to see what happens when we have price convergence. Meanwhile, I certainly agree with you that Google delivers. Its just that each market seeks its “happy spot”, and Apple can still scratch an itch that satisfies both users and shareholders (thats their “job”). Today, I don’t really see much difference between an iPhone and my LG. I actually like Sunrise Calendar better than Apple’s iCal. Verizon’s cross-platform messaging is on-par with Apple’s. LG’s keyboard is about as good as Apple’s (for the first time I am comfortable texting on an Android device).

I’ll wave a caution flag for you, here… When the next iOS is released, and people see how it is integrated with OS X Yosemite now, they are going to be stunned. In closing on this part of the exchange, and despite all of our theories and opinions, a clear advantage that Google has over Apple today is the founders still live. I’m once again a Google supporter.

And, Nicholas, I have you to thank for that because I always, always, valued and appreciated your conviction and passion over the company.

– Brian

Share

the Freedom of Terror and Truth

July22

so…about the nature of truth.

ponder how difficult it is to convey the truth when everybody is speaking a different language.

…tongues, dialects, video, coding, body language, signing…

for example, the word ‘terrorist’ and the word ‘freedom fighter’ can be used to refer to the same people at any given time, or for a considered cause.

The word “hysterical” is another brilliant example of how “rich” the English language is with words that can have multiple meanings and applications.

with everyone speaking differently, truth is almost impossible to agree upon. yet believing in the existence of truth is the only thing that keeps us from devolving into tribal warfare. because without the existence of truth, the person who is most powerful becomes the person who is right.

soon I’ll talk about how God, and a belief structure, works in much the same way.

peace be to my Brothers and Sisters.

brian patrick cork

Share
posted under God, Stuff, Truth | No Comments »
« Older Entries

What’s All This About?

"What am I looking at?", you might wonder.

Lots of stuff.

Meanwhile, here, I discuss events, people and things in our world - and, my (hardly simplistic, albeit inarticulate) views around them.

You'll also learn things about, well, things, like people you need to know about, and information about companies you can't find anywhere else.

So, while I harangue the public in my not so gentle way, you will discover that I am fascinated by all things arcane, curious about those whom appear religious, love music, dabble in politics, loathe the media, value education, still think I am an athlete, and might offer a recipe.

All the while, striving mightily, and daily, to remain a prudent and optimistic gentleman - and, authentic.

brian cork by John Campbell





photos by John Campbell

 

Share this Blog with friends or enemies (via Twitter). Do it!:

Twitter Updates

Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.

Archives

Share

Email Subscription

Linkedin

View Brian Cork's profile on LinkedIn

Categories